WEF Report #3: Unlocking the Value of Personal Data!

The World Economic Forum released its third major report about Rethinking Personal Data: Unlocking the Value of Personal Data: From Collection to Usage. PDEC has worked with the WEF’s Rethinking Personal Data project since before its first gathering in the Summer of 2010. It is really gratifying to see this third report come out and continue to move the issue forward.

The Rethinking Personal Data work is now within a larger umbrella WEF’s calling “Hyperconnectivity,” lead by Bill Hoffman, the original steward of the Rethinking Personal Data project.

Unlocking’s executive summary highlighted what PDEC member startups have been building:

New ways to engage the individual, help them understand and provide them with the tools to make real choices based on clear value exchange.

and the path forward of

Needing to demonstrate how a usage, contextual model can work in specific real world application.

The report says we must solve simplicity and elegance of design for usability so people can see the data generated by and about them.
The last part of the executive summary calls for “stakeholders to more effectively understand the dynamics of how the personal data ecosystem operates. A better coordinated way to share learning, shorten feedback loops and improve evidence-based policy-making must be established.”
The Rethinking Personal Data project convened six face-to-face events leading to the report. I participated in four of them in 2012 on behalf of PDEC: March in San Jose, June in London, September in Tianjin, and October in Brussels.

One of the meetings’ themes was the challenge to rise to the Fair Information Practice Principles. The US FTC‘s FIPPs were written in the 1970′s when citizens raised concerns to Congress about how they were ending up on catalogue mailing lists. This offline model is not an ideal basis for how to address the economic opportunities of personal data and the challenges it presents today.

The second chapter covers the context of data use, where everything surrounding data use affects people’s privacy expectations and the choices of institutions using their data. It’s great seeing this level of nuance brought to a general business audience.

This report is notable for highlighting the role of the personal data store in initatives put forward by the UK, French and US governments that mandate Data Handbacks, that data created by an individual when transacting with a government or business should be given back to the individual.

 

A few paragraphs stand out for me in looking ahead and the opportunity for PDEC companies.

Potentially, markets can encourage a “race to the top” in which user control and understanding of how data is used and leveraged become competitive differentiators. Various trust marks and independent scoring systems will help stimulate this kind of response.

Given the complexity of choices, there is also potential for the development of “agency type” services to be offered to help individuals. In such a scenario, parties would assist others (often for a commission or other fee) in a variety of complex settings. Financial advisers, real estate agents, bankers, insurance brokers and other similar “agency” roles are familiar examples of situations when one party exercises choice and control for another party via intermediary arrangements. Just as individuals have banks and financial advisers to leverage their financial assets and take care of their interests for them, the same type of “on behalf of” services are already starting to be offered with respect to data.

The last section of the report outlines thirteen different use-cases for personal data by a range of stakeholders, including two PDEC startup circle companiesPersonal and Reputation.com.

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

Mass-Educational Databases = Wrong Architecture

permrecord--tablet

permrecord–tablet (Photo credit: teach42)

 

Every day it seems there is a new story about new “big data” systems are going to make things better – but then… they just made things creepier.

 

The latest news like this came from inBloom Inc. via SXSW-Edu (on Reuters). inBloom is a newly formed nonprofit to host a massive database of student records created with $100 million in funding from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.  The goal seems good: track the progress of students through school and use the data to improve their outcomes.

 

The records can be comprehensive and inBloom doesn’t need students’ parents to consent to have their records in the database.

 

Federal officials say the database project complies with privacy laws. Schools do not need parental consent to share student records with any “school official” who has a “legitimate educational interest,” according to the Department of Education. The department defines “school official” to include private companies hired by the school, so long as they use the data only for the purposes spelled out in their contracts.

 

The whole idea that you must have one massive educational database of all student records is an architecture of the past.

 

The core idea is right: more data about a student’s learning experience in school is good for them and could be good for the overall school system. The challenge is how it is engineered. Are students and their parents put at the center of their own data lives? Or are they in another giant system they have little control over or say in?

 

We need to empower students with their own personal clouds. They must be able to download their own student learning records. They must be able to share them with companies and services that will work on their behalf. With personal clouds and infomediaries to help, students will find educational resources/and tools that can help them fill gaps in their learning and discover communities of interest. This infomediary market approach puts personal data to use without revealing any more data than needed and only on the student’s terms.

 

Infomediary Market Model for Personal Data

 

 

In this market model the individual collects data in their personal cloud. This could be a machine in their home or a service provider they trust (they must have the right & ability to move service providers with all their data if this is truly a personal cloud service). The individual trusts an infomediary service to look into their personal cloud but does so with a fiduciary duty to the end-user. The infomediary then works on their behalf in the market place to find relevant vendors and services.  It does not reveil specific personally identifying information to prospective service providers. It helps the individual have good choices and they decide who to transact with (thus reveling personal information).

 

The inBloom project sounds like an marketing project: companies will comb through the data base, find students to approach, and sell them with “education” products. The student data is up for grabs.

 

We need a better set of policies, technologies, and products that put parents and their kids at the center of and in control of their data. This single point of failure won’t do.

 

 

Enhanced by Zemanta

The emerging market that could kill the iPhone

CNNMoney

The emerging market that could kill the iPhone A handful of tech startups are competing for a foothold in the nascent market for personal data control. And that could mean major changes for the likes of Apple, Google and Microsoft.
By Francesca Robin, contributor

How then to profit? Kaliya Hamlin, a privacy and user-centric advocate and executive director of the Personal Data Ecosystem Consortium, shared sections of an unpublished report “Personal Data Landscape,” which outlines three primary business models. As an example, data stored in lockers or accessed via real-time Web browsing can be explicitly for sale-by-owner, or brokered through third-party vendors who sell the information to advertisers. Or, with data aggregation services, users pool their data with others into a larger repository that’s sold (or shared) with businesses and services. “There are likely many more models,” stresses Hamlin.

The Customer as God

WSJ

The Customer as a God Businesses today tend to herd customers as if they were cattle, but a revolution in personal empowerment is under way—and buying will never be the same again. By Doc Searls [of Project VRM]

This article does not mention PDEC by name or any of the companies but does a great job of painting a picture of the future with personal clouds and services around them.

Personal Data Vaults Put You in Control of Your Data Online

Personal Data Vaults Put You in Control of Your Data Online New startups have emerged to help consumers secure, manage, and share their personal data exclusively with trusted individuals, companies, and institutions.
By Mark Sullivan, PCWorld
This article covers Personal indepth and also highlights several other Consortium Members on the 2nd page: Qiy, Lifedash, Allfiled and Mydex

SDForum TechWomen Presentation

More (European) Podcast Soon

I’m heading to Europe on Wednesday June 6th for three weeks. The travel plans and events are below. One of the main reasons I am going is to connect with the peoples and communities in Europe working on identity, personal data. I plan to come back with about 10 podcasts recorded with key people from the community that I meet along the way – these will be edited on my return and posted on the web publicly.

TRAVEL PLANS:

  • June 7th I arrive in London and have meetings/social things
  • June 11th is an Identity, Personal Data & Personal Clouds Unconfernece I am facilitating and Tony Fish is organizing - Your INVITED!
  • June 12th is the OIX Event
  • June 12-13th is New Digital Economics
  • June 14th is WEF Tiger Team Day
  • June 15-17 Netherlands
  • June 18-19 is the Digital Enlightenment Forum
  • June 20th I plan to travel to Paris
  • I might travel to Geneva..
  • June 25-27th in Berlin
  • June 27th I fly out of Berlin to SF.

Personal Data Journal #3

 In this Issue:

Feature Article: Personal Data in Decentralized Network Architectures, by Markus Sabadello, Technical Analyst

Special Report:  Privacy Bill of Rights from the White House,

Book Review: The Daily YouConsent of the Networked

Opinions

  • Personal Data as a New Asset Class: Petroleum or Snake Oil? by Sara Wedeman
  • Words of a Feather by Tony Fish

Publisher’s Note: ”Catalyzing the Ecosystem,”

Editorial: “US and EU: A Tale of Two Cities,”

+ Industry News, Upcoming EventsEvents, The Latest on Standards and New Resources. 

You can subscribe here.

O’Brien: Kaliya Hamlin tackles our online identities by Chris O’Brien in the San Jose Mercury News, March 7th, 2012

On Tuesday, the World Economic Forum acknowledged Hamlin’s work in this area by announcing she was one of the 192 people from around the world selected for its Young Global Leaders program. The WEF is based in Switzerland, and is perhaps best known for organizing the annual Davos forum.

People like Hamlin interest me because they constitute what I think of as tech’s quiet influencers. Their power doesn’t flow from holding a big corporate title, but from their passion around a subject and their ability to persuade others through their writing, talks and research.

NSTIC Governance Workshop, March 15

Kaliya will be attending:

Thursday, March 15, 2012

Main Auditorium, U.S. Department of Commerce – Herbert C. Hoover Building, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC

Since the creation of the Internet, there have always been difficult questions surrounding privacy, security and trust. How do we know with whom we are interacting? How do we know they are trustworthy? How do we balance the desires for anonymity and personal privacy with the need to secure our information and transactions? In an effort to address these questions, President Obama signed the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace (NSTIC or “Strategy”).

The U.S. Department of Commerce and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) will host a workshop with thought leaders from government and industry to discuss aspects of the Identity Ecosystem governance structure called for in the NSTIC.

This workshop will review and take questions on NIST’s February 2012 paper, Recommendations for Establishing an Identity Ecosystem Governance Structure, and on specific issues concerning the establishment of that governance structure.